Sources

SRC-087

Eurelectric, Draft Implementing Regulation on carbon price paid in a third country under CBAM: Eurelectric Response, 9 June 2026

Source ID
SRC-087
Citation
Eurelectric, Draft Implementing Regulation on carbon price paid in a third country under CBAM: Eurelectric Response, 9 June 2026
URL or path
research/2026-06-09-Draft-IR-on-carbon-price-paid-in-a-third-country-under-CBAM-Eurelectric-final.pdf
Type
Industry association consultation response
Hierarchy tier
3
Published
2026-06-09
Accessed
2026-08-15
Snapshot
AUTHOR-SUPPLIED 15 August 2026, 6 pages, read in full.
Claims
CH3 CBAM channel
Status
READ

Version history

The register keeps changing after the book is fixed in print. Each entry below was added to this row in the order shown.

  1. A CONSULTATION RESPONSE TO THE DRAFT, NOT THE DRAFT. Eurelectric is the European electricity industry association and this is its submission to the four-week consultation that closed on 10 June 2026. WHAT IT ESTABLISHES, and it is worth having: that the draft exists, that it was consulted on, and that its provisions are contested by an affected industry. It is the second independent corroboration of the publication alongside SRC-085. WHAT IT QUOTES from the draft: Article 6.2 defining 'Ref Price CBAM' as the yearly reference price of CBAM certificates in EUR per tonne of CO2e for the year of import, and a cap on the use of international credits of up to 10 per cent, which the respondent calls a positive step. WHAT IT MAY NOT DO. It is tier 3 and it is an interested party. EVIDENCE_PROTOCOL bars a secondary-tier figure from prose, and CLAUDE.md requires recording what a source says attributed to that source rather than what it implies. A lobbying submission quoting a draft is evidence that the submission quoted it, not evidence of the draft's terms. CHAPTER 3 MAY NOT DESCRIBE THE DRAFT'S CONTENTS FROM THIS DOCUMENT, and may not print the 10 per cent cap or the Article 6.2 definition as provisions. THE DRAFT ACT ITSELF IS STILL NOT OBTAINED, AND THE D-051 DISPOSITION NOW CHANGES. Routes tried on 15 August 2026 and their results: the Commission's own news page of 13 May 2026, 200, links only to the call for evidence and the synopsis; Have your say initiative 14830, landing page and API, 200, whose only attachments are the call for evidence in 24 languages; the Have your say initiative search, 200, returns 14830 alone; the Comitology Register document search, 200 BUT A JAVASCRIPT APPLICATION SHELL THAT CURL CANNOT RENDER; the Comitology search API path, 404. THE REMAINING ROUTES NEED THE AUTHOR RATHER THAN THIS PROCESS: the Comitology Register browsed interactively in a browser that executes JavaScript, a direct request to DG TAXUD, or the Official Journal once the act is adopted. Under D-051 as amended, that is the test for out of reach, so the sentence in Chapter 3 that relies on this carries the fact under the EVIDENCE_PROTOCOL and D-029 exception rather than being barred outright. It remains barred from describing the draft's TERMS, because no opened document states them.