Finding Our Place in the New Syria and the Fear of Losing the Victim Identity
At last, the Assad regime has fallen after a long and painful era. While this historic event carries profound hope for a new Syria, it also stirs complex and difficult emotions for many of us. What many of us are experiencing is the fear of losing the victim role.

At last, the Assad regime has fallen after a long and painful era. While this historic event carries profound hope for a new Syria, it also stirs complex and difficult emotions for many of us. If we find ourselves feeling uneasy, navigating a strange mixture of relief, anxiety, and even a subtle sense of loss, we are not alone. What many of us are experiencing is the fear of losing the victim role: the fear that our immense suffering might be forgotten, and that a defining part of our identity might be erased.
For over five decades, the Assad regime employed a systematic "divide and rule" strategy, pitting different communities against one another while maintaining an iron grip over the entire population, including minorities. While the regime loudly claimed to protect minorities, its actions in reality fostered sectarianism and the marginalisation of numerous communities, including, but by no means limited to, the Kurds, Assyrians, and even those Alawites and Christians who dared to dissent. This constructed a highly intricate web of oppression, where some felt targeted because of their identity, others faced persecution due to their political beliefs, and many suffered from both.
Acknowledging this complexity does not mean overlooking the suffering of the Sunni majority, who bore a colossal share of the regime's direct brutality. The experience of oppression in Syria is multi-faceted and cannot be reduced to a single, oversimplified narrative.
Now, with Assad gone, it feels as though the very ground has shifted beneath our feet. The regime that used sectarianism as a primary tool of control is no more. This is an entirely positive and necessary change, yet it can also be deeply disorienting. We might naturally ask ourselves: Who are we now in the absence of this specific brand of oppression? What is our purpose? Will our suffering, or the suffering we witnessed, be recognised? Will our stories still matter? Does the transitional government's mandate to repair what was broken mean that we will somehow lose our identity and our history?
Our Feelings Are Legitimate, Our Experiences Are Diverse
It is vital to understand that these feelings are entirely legitimate. It is okay to feel a sense of loss, and even grief, for an identity forged in the crucible of oppression or shaped by witnessing its horrors. It is okay to feel anxious about the future and uncertain about our place in this new Syria. Our experiences, whether as members of targeted minorities or as allies who stood in active solidarity, are diverse and complex. Every single one of them matters. They are part of who we are, and they are an inseparable part of Syria's story.
The "fear of losing the victim role" can manifest in several distinct ways:
Loss of Purpose: We may find ourselves feeling lost and directionless. When a struggle has defined our lives or our understanding of the world for so long, its sudden end can leave a profound void.
Hesitation to Trust: After decades of betrayal and false promises under a regime that manipulated and exploited differences, trusting any new authority can feel impossible. This hesitation might lead us to resist change, clinging to familiar narratives of oppression or injustice because they are safe and known, even if they are painful.
Lingering Trauma: The trauma we have suffered or witnessed does not easily vanish with a change of government. It lingers, making it difficult to move forward, particularly when we feel that the very identity that helped us cope with that trauma is under threat.
Fear of Erasure: The notion that our suffering might be minimised or forgotten in this new era is deeply painful. This applies both to minorities whose unique experiences risk being overlooked, and to the Sunni majority who bore the brunt of the oppression by being directly targeted, in the broader narrative of national reconciliation.
Beyond Collective Grievance: Towards Genuine Equality
Yet, amidst these difficult emotions, there is also light at the end of the tunnel. The fall of the regime is not the end of our story; it is the beginning of a new chapter, a chapter in which we can transcend the mindset of collective victimhood and build a society rooted in genuine equality.
This new Syria has the potential to be a place where all forms of suffering are acknowledged and validated. The transitional authorities bear a profound responsibility to address past grievances, establish robust mechanisms for truth, accountability, and reconciliation, and ensure that the voices of all marginalised groups are finally heard, regardless of their background.
In this new Syria, we can finally be seen as individuals, rather than just as members of a group. We are far more than our religious or ethnic labels. We are individuals with unique skills, talents, hopes, and dreams. This new Syria requires the contributions of every single person to rebuild and recover.
We can also find a renewed sense of purpose. Instead of fighting against an oppressor or being defined strictly by our group's suffering, we can now channel our energy into building a just and equitable society for all Syrians, where every citizen is valued and respected. Finally, this new era offers the possibility of healing and finding peace. By accessing mental health support and fostering a community that values healing and reconciliation, we can begin to address our traumas and find a path to redemption.
Finding Our Place Together, on Equal Footing
The journey ahead will not be easy. It will demand courage, patience, and a willingness to embrace change. It will require us to redefine our identity, not merely as victims of the past or as members of a specific group, but as equal citizens in a new Syria. It will require open dialogue, mutual understanding, and a commitment to dismantling the structures of division that kept us apart for so long.
To navigate this path, we can begin by reaching out to one another across community boundaries:
Share and Listen: Let us share our feelings and experiences with those we trust, and make a conscious effort to listen to and understand the experiences of those from different backgrounds.
Prioritise Healing: We must seek support and not be afraid to reach out to mental health professionals who can help us process our trauma or anxiety as we navigate this transitional phase.
Engage Actively: Let us find ways to contribute to Syria's reconstruction, whether through activism, community organising, supporting those in need, or simply by sharing our stories.
Remember Shared Humanity: We have all suffered under the regime, albeit in different ways, and we all have a stake in building a better future. Let us focus on our shared humanity and our collective aspirations for a just and peaceful Syria.
Focus on Individual Rights and Equality: While acknowledging the past injustices faced by different groups is crucial, we must strive to build a society where every individual is treated with dignity and respect, regardless of their background. Let us move beyond the singular focus on group identities and embrace a future where all citizens are truly equal under the law.
The road ahead is long, but it is also filled with hope. We are not alone on this journey. Our experiences matter, our voices matter, and our future matters. Let us work together to build a new Syria, a Syria where justice prevails, where healing is possible, and where every citizen can find their rightful place. This is our chance to turn the page on a dark chapter and write a new story of hope and renewal together, a story defined not by the divisions of the past, but by our shared commitment to a future where all Syrians are truly free and equal.
Related posts
Article 02: Why EPCs Do Not Tell You How Much Energy a Building Uses
A series mining the PhD thesis on London and UK office buildings (Azhari, 2025). Key takeaway. A statistical analysis of 2,654 Greater London offices finds no significant relationship between EPC band and measured energy use, which is uncomfortable for MEES, ESOS and due diligence.
The Confidence Tax: Why Reviving Syria's Ottoman Endowment Records Will Cost More Than It Recovers
An analysis of the Syrian Ministry of Endowments' plan to reclaim historic waqf properties using Ottoman archives. Explore why reopening century-old title deeds acts as a tax on property confidence, undermining post-conflict reconstruction and urban recovery.
Article 01: The 30/85/89 Problem: Why a Sliver of London Offices Drives Almost All Its Office Energy Use
A series mining the PhD thesis “London and UK Office Buildings: Investigating Energy Use and Landlord-Tenant Influences” (Azhari, 2025). Key takeaway. Thirty per cent of London office buildings above 1,000 square metres hold 85 per cent of the office floor area and consume 89 per cent of the office energy. The concentration is so extreme