SRC-109
The Syria Report, 'Explained: How Law No. 23 of 2015 Authorises Property Seizure During Zoning'
مضمون هذا الصفّ بلغته الأصلية؛ وأسماء الحقول وشروحها بالعربية.
- المعرّف
- الوثيقة
- The Syria Report, 'Explained: How Law No. 23 of 2015 Authorises Property Seizure During Zoning'
- أين توجد
- نوع الوثيقة
- Specialist housing, land and property reporting
- درجة الدليل
- 4(تحقيق صحفي أو تقرير متخصص رصين يسمّي منهجه ومصادره)
- تاريخ النشر
- 2020-10-21
- أول مرة فتحها المؤلف
- 2026-08-16
- سجل الاسترجاع
- Archived locally under D-062 on 16 August 2026 by برنامج تدقيق, raw bytes plus a text extract, with URL, date, HTTP status, byte count and SHA-256 in محفوظة في أرشيف المؤلف. Verified there by string search. Raw copy محفوظة في أرشيف المؤلف, text محفوظة في أرشيف المؤلف, 152711 bytes, SHA-256 0e456f7ce53e256f677f78dcd94be8978646e49098ae919d369955cf0daa2cb7.
قيد لاحق: HELD. Retrieved 1 September 2026 by plain HTTP GET with a browser User-Agent, HTTP 200, 159066 bytes, SHA-256 1deb161b9c15eb14..., at محفوظة في أرشيف المؤلف. The capture terminates correctly. THIS ROW PREVIOUSLY CARRIED AN ADDRESS AND NO HELD FILE, so anything it recorded as read could not be checked by anyone; it can now. - ما يعتمد عليه الكتاب فيها
- CH4 Law 23; FIG-04-017
- إلى أي حد قُرئت
- READ(فُتحت وقُرئت)
سجلّ التعديلات
يبقى السجل يتغيّر بعد أن يثبت الكتاب في الطباعة. وكل قيد أدناه أُضيف إلى هذا الصفّ بالترتيب المبيَّن، الأقدم أولاً.
- READ AT THE PAGE 16 August 2026. VERBATIM: '40 percent of the total area of the property may be deducted, free of charge, from sites outside provincial centres'; '50 percent may be deducted from properties within those centres'; 'If the deducted area of the property exceeds the previous percentage, the owner can do nothing but request compensation for the extra deducted area'; 'The size of the compensation payment is based on Expropriations Law No. 20 of 1983'. TWO THINGS THIS ROW MUST CARRY. FIRST, IT CORRECTS THE MANUSCRIPT: Chapter 4 v1 printed 'up to around forty per cent of the surface' with the condition stripped, and invented a threshold at half a holding that is in no account of the law. SECOND, IT DISAGREES WITH SRC-107, which is the same publication five years later and puts the 40 per cent IN city centres rather than outside them. TWO PUBLISHED ACCOUNTS OF ONE CEILING, ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF THE SAME BOUNDARY. Neither may be printed as the law. The chapter carries the disagreement, which is its own subject. SRC-045 carries neither figure: 'forty' returns zero occurrences in that 61-page report.
- THE FORUM SENTENCE, VERBATIM, added 16 September 2026 (M1 of the Chapter 4 v49 review, which found the v49 manifest's adjudication said this row quoted it when it did not): 'This is done before a Preliminary Appraisal Committee formed in accordance with Law No. 23, and whose decisions are issued definitively.' It precedes 'The size of the compensation payment is based on Expropriations Law No. 20 of 1983' on the page, and Chapter 4 line 111's clause 'which sends the owner to the same appraisal committee' rests on it. [سجلّ عمل داخلي, after the v49 review]