Retrieved and read 12 August 2026 under the D-046 Part One sweep || HELD. Retrieved 1 September 2026 by plain HTTP GET with a browser User-Agent, HTTP 200, 55856 bytes, SHA-256 902b33737a28f6a8..., at research/retrieved/SRC-062_middleeasteye.net.html. The capture terminates correctly. THIS ROW PREVIOUSLY CARRIED AN ADDRESS AND NO HELD FILE, so anything it recorded as read could not be checked by anyone; it can now.
Status
READ
Version history
The register keeps changing after the book is fixed in print. Each entry below was added to this row in the order shown.
NAMED IN CHAPTER 2's DISCLOSED-BUT-UNOPENED LIST AND NEVER ATTEMPTED. Opened as a row on 11 August 2026 on the absences pass finding that four documents the chapter discloses had no register row at all, so the disclosure could not be checked. The distinction the pass drew is the operative one: the chapter's four conditions require a retrieval attempted, failed and recorded, and this is a document nobody has tried. It is therefore not an exception under D-029; it is an open gap. Chapter 2 v14 states the position in the prose, that the author carries it from earlier working, has not tried to retrieve it, and cannot say what form of words it uses. NO CLAIM IN THIS BOOK MAY REST ON IT until it is opened. RETRIEVED AND READ 12 August 2026 under the D-046 sweep, after standing at TO_OBTAIN. Article dated 19 May 2020. VERBATIM: 'He is often said to have controlled around 60 percent of the Syrian economy before war broke out in 2011', IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWED BY 'however experts say that number is an exaggeration.' THE OUTLET PRINTS THE REFUTATION IN THE SAME BREATH AS THE CLAIM. Attribution is to unspecified observers on one side and unnamed experts on the other, so neither limb is sourced. THIS IS THE MORE CONSEQUENTIAL OF THE TWO. Chapter 2 names Al Jazeera and Middle East Eye among the outlets carrying the sixty per cent share; one of them carries an express statement that the figure is exaggerated. Any sentence implying these outlets propagate the claim unqualified is wrong and is held for correction. The chapter's underlying point survives and improves: the figure and its refutation both circulate without a named source.