← rayanazhari.co.ukAbout the bookENع
Rayan Azhari.
The evidence register for Financing Syria’s Reconstruction

Property instruments · live register

The instruments that can move land

The twelve instruments Chapter 4 reads, the links the chapter states between them, what each gives an owner, and which law each scheme says it is made under. Where the record is silent, the page says so.

How they connect

Instruments sit in the column of their year. An arrow is a link the chapter states in so many words; select an instrument to read them. Instruments outside the twelve appear only where a link reaches them.

amendsappliescites, names, refers or carries overprevails over any other lawmeets a law’s requirements without naming it

No repeal found in the searchRead; repeal not searchedNamed onlyOutside the twelve

195219832012201520172018202120252026Law 10 of 2018 (amended by Law 42 of 2018) amends Legislative Decree 66 of 2012Law 42 of 2018 amends Law 10 of 2018 (amended by Law 42 of 2018)Law 42 of 2018 amends Legislative Decree 66 of 2012Presidential Decree 114 of 2025 amends Investment Law 18 of 2021Presidential Decree 114 of 2025 prevails over any other law it conflicts withPresidential Decree 16 of 2025 cites Constitutional Declaration, 13 March 2025Presidential Decree 16 of 2025 cancels decisions made under Legislative Decree 63 of 2012Constitutional Declaration, 13 March 2025 carries over the laws in forceDecree 237 of 2021 meets the requirements of, without naming Law 10 of 2018 (amended by Law 42 of 2018)Law 3 of 2018 refers to the Expropriation Law of 1983Legislative Decree 66 of 2012 names Law 111 of 1952Law 23 of 2015 names Law 20 of 2015Rif Dimashq Decision 4520 of 2026 applies Law 3 of 2018Investment Authority Decision 95 of 2026 applies Investment Law 18 of 2021Legislative Decree 66 of 2012Legislative Decree66 of 2012two Damascusredevelopment zonesFormer governmentLegislative Decree 63 of 2012Legislative Decree63 of 2012precautionaryattachmentsFormer governmentLaw 23 of 2015Law 23 of 2015urban planning;deduction duringzoningFormer governmentLaw 33 of 2017Law 33 of 2017reconstitution ofdamaged registrydocumentsFormer governmentLaw 10 of 2018 (amended by Law 42 of 2018)Law 10 of 2018(amended by Law 42of 2018)Decree 66 nationwideFormer governmentLaw 3 of 2018Law 3 of 2018rubble removalFormer governmentLaw 31 of 2018Law 31 of 2018the Ministry ofEndowmentsFormer governmentInvestment Law 18 of 2021Investment Law 18of 2021development zonesFormer governmentDecree 237 of 2021Decree 237 of 2021Qaboun and HarastazoningFormer governmentConstitutional Declaration, 13 March 2025ConstitutionalDeclaration, 13March 2025Articles 48 and 51TransitionalPresidential Decree 16 of 2025Presidential Decree16 of 2025attachments of 2012to 2024 cancelledTransitionalPresidential Decree 114 of 2025Presidential Decree114 of 2025Law 18 amendedTransitionalLaw 42 of 2018any other law itconflicts withthe laws in forcethe ExpropriationLaw of 1983Law 111 of 1952Law 20 of 2015Rif DimashqDecision 4520 of2026InvestmentAuthority Decision95 of 2026

What the repeal search reached

No repeal of the five standing instruments appears in the sources the book holds. That is a statement about the search, and this is its reach: the Official Gazette as the book holds it, read in full for 2025 and 2026 to issue 36, and in its general indexes for 2005 and 2008 to October 2024. A repeal published in a grey year would not have been found.

the general indexes: 2005, and 2008 to 31 October 2024the general indexes: 2005, and 2008 to 31 October 2024the volumes read in full: the hundred documents of 2025, and sixty-seven Arabic documents of 2026, to issue 36 of 17 September 2026the volumes read in full: the hundred documents of 2025, and sixty-seven Arabic documents of 2026, to issue 36 of 17 September 2026a repeal published before 2005, or in 2006 or 2007, would not appear19811990200020052010201520202026

Volumes read in fullGeneral indexes readA gap the chapter namesNot reached

The twelve, one by one

2012 · Former government

Legislative Decree 66 of 2012

two Damascus redevelopment zones

No repeal found in the search

Counted among the five standing instruments in the repeal search.

What it does
two redevelopment areas in Damascus; land for roads, squares and public buildings deducted free of charge
Owner’s window
one calendar year from the announcement, since Law 42 of 2018 (thirty days before it)
What the owner gets
shares in the new plots; a non-applicant's shares sold at auction, the proceeds paid to the owner every six months
Who decides
the administrative unit's committee; appeal to the civil Court of Appeal within thirty days

Read in: SRC-127

2012 · Former government

Legislative Decree 63 of 2012

precautionary attachments

Named only, not described

Not among the numbers the repeal search was run against.

What it gives an owner is not set out for this instrument in the register’s terms table.

Read in: SRC-453

2015 · Former government

Law 23 of 2015

urban planning; deduction during zoning

No repeal found in the search

Searched for a repeal as one of the six other numbers the chapter mentions.

What it does
compulsory readjustment: properties merged and redistributed as shares after a deduction
Owner’s window
none stated in the chapter
What the owner gets
shares in proportion to the holding; the excess over the ceiling (forty per cent outside governorate centres, fifty inside) paid at real value; an occupant, forty per cent of the assessed value of the part occupied
Who decides
the administrative body; the initial appraisal committee under Article 21

Read in: SRC-125

2017 · Former government

Law 33 of 2017

reconstitution of damaged registry documents

Read; repeal not searched

Not among the numbers the repeal search was run against.

What it does
reconstitution of registry documents destroyed, damaged or lost; takes no land
Owner’s window
fifteen days to appeal an administrative rebuild; six months to object to a judicial one; then five years to sue for the right and fifteen for compensation
What the owner gets
a sheet the real estate judge has rebuilt, with absolute probative force once the five years run
Who decides
the governorate's director of real estate affairs (administrative route; appeal to the court of first instance within fifteen days), or a real estate judge (judicial route; objections decided in chambers, confirmation decisions appealable within fifteen days)

The chapter states no link between this instrument and the others.

Read in: SRC-604

2018 · Former government

Law 10 of 2018 (amended by Law 42 of 2018)

Decree 66 nationwide

No repeal found in the search

Counted among the five standing instruments in the repeal search.

What it does
Decree 66's zones anywhere in the country, by decree on the minister's proposal
Owner’s window
one calendar year from the announcement (thirty days before Law 42)
What the owner gets
nominal certificates for shares in the new plots, held in common, within six months of the distribution decision
Who decides
the administrative unit's committee; appeal to the civil Court of Appeal within thirty days, decided within thirty days

Read in: SRC-097, SRC-096

2018 · Former government

Law 3 of 2018

rubble removal

No repeal found in the search

Counted among the five standing instruments in the repeal search.

What it does
removal of rubble from damaged and demolished buildings, by a governor's determination
Owner’s window
thirty days from the announcement to apply
What the owner gets
the rubble and private belongings of the owner's own building; the land's fate not answered in the instrument
Who decides
the governor names the area, with no appeal route in the text; a judge's committee draws up the owners' table, appealable to the civil appellate court

Read in: SRC-115

2018 · Former government

Law 31 of 2018

the Ministry of Endowments

No repeal found in the search

Searched for a repeal as one of the six other numbers the chapter mentions.

What it gives an owner is not set out for this instrument in the register’s terms table.

The chapter states no link between this instrument and the others.

Read in: SRC-126

2021 · Former government

Investment Law 18 of 2021

development zones

No repeal found in the search

Counted among the five standing instruments in the repeal search.

What it gives an owner is not set out for this instrument in the register’s terms table.

Read in: SRC-119

2021 · Former government

Decree 237 of 2021

Qaboun and Harasta zoning

Read; repeal not searched

Not among the numbers the repeal search was run against.

What it does
a zoning area at the northern entrance of Damascus, Qaboun and Harasta
Owner’s window
none in the decree; the thirty days reported were not in its text
What the owner gets
not stated in the decree, which names no procedure
Who decides
not named in the decree

Read in: SRC-611, SRC-099

2025 · Transitional

Constitutional Declaration, 13 March 2025

Articles 48 and 51

Read; repeal not searched

Not among the numbers the repeal search was run against.

What it gives an owner is not set out for this instrument in the register’s terms table.

Read in: SRC-450, SRC-448

2025 · Transitional

Presidential Decree 16 of 2025

attachments of 2012 to 2024 cancelled

Read; repeal not searched

Not among the numbers the repeal search was run against.

What it gives an owner is not set out for this instrument in the register’s terms table.

Read in: SRC-453

2025 · Transitional

Presidential Decree 114 of 2025

Law 18 amended

No repeal found in the search

Counted among the five standing instruments in the repeal search.

What it gives an owner is not set out for this instrument in the register’s terms table.

Read in: SRC-119

Which law is this scheme made under?

Five schemes, and for each the question an owner would ask first. A solid entry is in the text; a dashed one is a gap the text leaves; a faint one is not set out at all.

In the textA gap the text leavesNot set out

Marota City, under Decree 66 of 2012 the instrument

The text

  • Legislative Decree No. 66 of 2012, sixty-four articles

Law it names

  • the decree itself

Law others say it rests on

  • no other law attributed in the chapter

What the owner gets

  • alternative housing at the families' own cost; none had received a home, on Enab Baladi's investigation of 17 May 2024
  • floor area to rise by 13.9 per cent and rent allowances to thirty-five times the previous rate, announced by Damascus Governorate, 5 May 2026, and read on 16 and 18 October 2026; owners' representatives rejected it

Sources: SRC-127, SRC-106, SRC-808, SRC-812

Qaboun and Harasta, under Decree 237 of 2021 the instrument

The text

  • two articles, read in the Gazette of 29 September 2021
  • latest evidence of its status, July 2025: the plan presented at an investment forum, on Enab Baladi's account

Law it names

  • none; it cites no law

Law others say it rests on

  • Syrians for Truth and Justice: it does not say
  • the Syrian Network for Human Rights: Law No. 23 of 2015 and Law No. 10 of 2018
  • The Syria Report, 28 May 2024: Law No. 10 of 2018, through Plan No. 104 of 2019

What the owner gets

  • thirty days, to 14 October 2021, on Syrians for Truth and Justice's account; the decree sets none
  • alternative housing only for residents of the target areas, which the displaced were not

Sources: SRC-611, SRC-099, SRC-045, SRC-111, SRC-128

Jobar, Decree No. 44 of 2021

The text

  • not read; approved by the governorate council, 7 September 2021

Law it names

  • not set out

Law others say it rests on

  • Decree No. 5 of 1982 as amended by Law No. 41 of 2002, in the chapter's account after The Syria Report, 5 July 2022
  • the governorate's Director of Urban Planning, on the same account: Law No. 23 of 2015 for the implementation area, meaning unclear to the outlet

What the owner gets

  • not set out; nothing published says what became of the plan

Sources: SRC-110

The Homs Dream

The text

  • none set out; in December 2019 the governor said the three neighbourhoods would be zoned under Law No. 10; the latest report the chapter gives, al-Ouruba of 2 September 2026, is of an amended zoning plan for Baba Amro approved by the governorate's executive office, naming no law

Law it names

  • not set out

Law others say it rests on

  • The Syria Report, January 2021: Law No. 5 of 1982, Law No. 10 of 2018 and Law No. 15 of 2008, whose differences “are difficult to define”

What the owner gets

  • depends on which law is applied to the street

Sources: SRC-104, SRC-857

Jobar, al-Qaboun and Tishreen, March 2026

The text

  • none; a verbal presentation, on the residents' account

Law it names

  • none; no decree number

Law others say it rests on

  • Decree No. 59 of 2026, named by one resident in The Syria Report, who says the scheme contradicts it
  • Decree No. 59, read in the Gazette on 16 October 2026: no district or zone, zoning plan, compensation or law but the Constitutional Declaration
  • the residents, 29 March 2026: Law No. 23 of 2015 instead, and Article 16 of the Constitutional Declaration

What the owner gets

  • fifty per cent of a home's area, thirty per cent of agricultural land: The Syria Report and Syria Direct
  • fifty to fifty-five square metres per hundred, thirty-five per cent of agricultural land's value: a committee member, in Enab Baladi, 19 April 2026
  • no account is a decision text

Sources: SRC-107, SRC-108, SRC-122, SRC-128, SRC-463

Drawn from the chapter version the author approved and from the register’s own tables. Every link above is held with the chapter’s words for it, and the page will not build if those words leave the chapter. None of this is legal advice, and none of it has been reviewed by Syrian housing, land and property counsel.